



This is the official "I don't get it"-part. Ships have sonars, right? Make them better? It seems awfully bigger investment to cover the whole sea with sonars, than to embed ships with better sonars? Or is the sonar less efficient from near surface? Well couldn't it then be floated below?
Also, it seems, the wavelength of 10-15 kHz will be disturbing to marine life like dolphins and whales. *sigh*
It's a Norwegian company, just like a past project I blogged about, Hywind, floating windmills into the ocean. http://blog.rz.fi/2006/02/floating-windmills-into-ocean.html
Read more: http://www.kongsberg.com/en/kog/news/featurestories/monitoring%20extreme%20ice%20conditions%20in%20the%20high%20north/ and https://www.newscientist.com/article/2093340-sonar-to-listen-for-moving-icebergs-near-arctic-oil-platforms/

I know this is like 4 days old news, but here it is, if you didn't hear it elsewhere: Google is finally releasing operating system based on Linux. I do say finally, as it's been in the waiting for quite some time.
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html
AdAge in a recent article publishes information that Microsoft is branding a new search engine Bing. Upcoming campaign budjet is estimated to be around 80-100 million dollars, and JWT as the agency who's doing the work.
As an interesting side note, Microsoft's own search front end statistics show that 42% of searches require refinement, and 25% of clicks are the back button. I wonder if Google has similar figures?

Monty Python on YouTube. Officially. Really. And spam. Of course. :)